Use case — Third-party risk

Third-party diligence on vendors, distributors and agents.

Onboarding and periodic re-screening of vendors, distributors, agents and intermediaries.

Why it matters

What the file usually misses.

Third parties acting on a company's behalf are the most persistent source of anti-bribery exposure, and the DOJ and SEC's own guidance treats risk-based diligence on those parties as a hallmark of an effective compliance programme. The practical problem is volume: a screening budget stretched across hundreds of counterparties usually degrades into a name search and a screenshot.

A fixed-fee report per counterparty makes documented diligence something you can run at onboarding and again at renewal, with a dated file that shows what was checked and by what method.

Who runs this check
  • Compliance and ethics functions
  • Procurement and supplier-risk teams
  • Export and trade-compliance managers
  • Counsel advising on anti-bribery programmes
Coverage

What we search on this matter type.

  1. 01Registry verification, incorporation date and filed ownership
  2. 02Sanctions, denied-party and watchlist screening across OFAC, EU, UN and UK lists
  3. 03Politically exposed persons and state ties among owners and officers
  4. 04Enforcement actions, debarment and regulatory findings
  5. 05Litigation, liens and insolvency signals
  6. 06Supply-chain and trade data where the counterparty moves goods (Level C)
Recommended level
Level A — Screening, escalating to B$750 per matter

Run Level A across the counterparty population as the standing onboarding check. Escalate to Level B for intermediaries with government touchpoints, opaque ownership, or any flag the screen raises; use Level C where the counterparty sits in the physical supply chain and trade, ESG or labour exposure is in scope.

Matter No. CR-2026-3915 · Level A — ScreeningIllustrative · details redacted

Distributor incorporated fourteen months before the tender it won; sole shareholder is the spouse of a serving procurement official in the same authority. No sanctions matches.

Overall risk rating — High · Delivered in 34 minutes
Limits of the method

Screening tells you what the record shows on the date it was searched; it does not monitor. Counterparty risk changes, so re-run material relationships at renewal. Beneficial ownership registers are incomplete in several jurisdictions and some are not public at all — the report names each register consulted and each one that could not be reached.

References
  1. 1DOJ and SEC — A Resource Guide to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act